
Certificate: 
Director: Billy Ray
Release Date: 14 May 2004
Tagline: Read between the lies.
Main Cast:
Hayden Christensen … Stephen Glass
Peter Saarsgaard … Charles ‘Chuck’ Lane
Chloë Sevigny … Caitlin Avey
Shattered Glass is the true story of Stephen Glass – a journalist who fell from grace when it was found he had fabricated over half of his articles. Hayden Christensen is brilliant as Glass. All those of you out there who think he can’t act should watch this and maybe have a little rethink.
Despite the fact that it doesn’t sound all that interesting (I’d never even heard of Stephen Glass before) it’s one of those films that draws you in and keeps your attention from start to finish.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: John Hillcoat
Release Date: 10 March 2006
Tagline: This land will be civilized.
Main Cast:
Guy Pearce … Charles Burns
Ray Winstone … Captain Stanley
Richard Wilson … Mike Burns
I’m finding it hard to be articulate about The Proposition. It’s such a powerful and intense film on so many levels that it’s a tough one to do justice to. It’s brutal, gritty, bloody and beautifully acted.
What initially attracted me to this film was Guy Pearce. He’s one of my favourite actors and is on top form here. I’m not a fan of Ray Winstone, and I think that Captain Stanley could have been better played by a different actor. Having said that, he does a decent enough job and doesn’t really detract from the film.
The costumes, hair and make up are worth mentioning. The clothes look like the most grungy, sweaty and stinking clothes I’ve ever seen in a film and Pearce looks so revolting that it made my skin itch just to look at him! The filth of the fly ridden sweatbox of the Australian outback is heightened even further by the finely dressed wife of Captain Stanley. She’s like an oasis of cleanliness in a desert of grime.
The Proposition is not for the faint-hearted. Its stark brutality is not easy to watch but it’s not violence for violence’s sake.
Civilize the land? The authorities are as brutal as the outlaws.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Robert Altman
Release Date: 5 January 2007
Tagline: Radio like you’ve never seen it before.
Main Cast: (many more than mentioned below)
Meryl Streep … Yolanda Johnson
Kevin Kline … Guy Noir
Ah… If only they were all more like this. Sadly though, this kind of film just doesn’t get made all that often because the majority of cinema goers are happy to watch dross. APHC is movie making at its best. The ensemble cast are perfect. There are clearly no egos vying for the most lines, the scene stealing moments etc. Robert Altman’s brilliant direction combined with the brilliant acting makes it all look so effortless.
I’m not going to bother to give you a synopsis. If you love films like I do then all you need to know is that it’s fantastic and that you won’t be disappointed.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Mike Nichols
Release Date: 13 April 1984
Tagline: On November 13, 1974, Karen Silkwood, an employee of a nuclear facility, left to meet with a reporter from the New York Times. She never got there.
Main Cast:
Meryl Streep … Karen Silkwood
Kurt Russell … Drew Stephens
Cher … Dolly Pelliker
Silkwood is based on the true story of Karen Silkwood, a chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee nuclear power plant in Oklahoma, USA who was contaminated with plutonium and died in a car crash in mysterious circumstances.
The acting is very good all round and Meryl Streep is, as usual, brilliant. The film concentrates on just telling the story. It never degenerates into preachy moralising, and does not attempt to provide any answers.
Wikipedia has some very good information on Karen Silkwood, and can be found here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Silkwood
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Patty Jenkins
Release Date: 2 April 2004
Tagline: Based on a true story.
Main Cast:
Charlize Theron … Aileen Wuornos
Christina Ricci … Selby Wall
Charlize Theron deservedly won the Best Actress Oscar in 2004 for her portrayal of Aileen Wuornos – America’s first female serial killer. She’s absolutely superb and is so like Aileen that it’s eerie.
I’m going to be fairly controversial here, but I have a large degree of sympathy for serial killers. All are born from a combination of events and life experiences that, thankfully, the vast majority of us will never know. Almost all have had atrocious childhoods and have been failed by either the adults in their lives or by the authorities. And in many cases, both. Aileen Wuornos falls into this criteria.
The film is not your standard Hollywood overblown affair. It’s a hard film to watch, and I defy anyone to not feel even a shred of sympathy for her. Of course, I’m not condoning serial killing, but rather than judge these people out of hand and dismiss them as monsters is unduly harsh.
Do I think Aileen was a monster? No. I think that she’d gone over the edge after a lifetime of abuse and degradation. I also think that had she not been assaulted, raped and faced certain death she never would have killed anyone in the first place. It is widely accepted that the first kill was done in self defence. Yes, she then *chose* to go on a killing spree, but how many of us know what our own breaking point is – much less anyone else’s?
Monster does not demonise her. That’s what I love about this film.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Roland Emmerich
Release Date: 27 May 2004
Tagline: This year, a sweater won’t do.
Main Cast:
Dennis Quaid … Jack Hall
Jake Gyllenhaal … Sam Hall
Emmy Rossum … Laura Chapman
Roland Emmerich is responsible for some of the worst movies ever made yet somehow they seem to make money. If you ever needed proof that the average movie goer is happy to watch poorly scripted and utterly ridiculous tosh, then look at Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow and, one suspects, 10,000 B.C. (at the time of writing, the latter has only just been released).
Out of the three films mentioned above, this one is the best. Not that it makes it good, mind you. It’s just not as dreadful as the others.
I know that this is a ‘disaster’ film, but the disaster should be the plot – not the film itself! Seriously though, I know that although you often have to suspend belief for such films, there is proof that they can be made with believable stories (The Towering Inferno is perhaps the best example).
The story is utterly ridiculous. Perhaps my favourite moment is where our heroes go into the ship to find medicine for the potentially fatally ill Laura. As if they weren’t in enough peril (in the middle of a climate catastrophe with a dying friend), there are some wolves (at least they look like wolves) that follow them into the ship and attack them.
Having said all that, as a ‘popcorn’ film, TDAT works reasonably well. However, it totally lacks any sense of danger and tension which are crucial elements of a good disaster film. Somehow you just know that all the main characters will live, and everything will be all right in the end. As is customary with Emmerich’s films it is riddled with clichés and is a fine example of a corny movie.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Danny Boyle
Release Date: 5 April 2007
Tagline: Dark days are coming.
Main Cast:
Cliff Curtis … Searle
Cillian Murphy … Capa
Michelle Yeoh … Corazon
I missed this film when it was on at the cinema and wish I hadn’t. Sunshine is perfect for the big screen. Most films set in space are, but this film has a certain feel to it that makes it especially true. There’s a real sense of isolation and vast expanse that is reminiscent of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The plot is very simple and feels, for the most part, very plausible. I didn’t find myself having to suspend belief to get anything out of it. The acting is very good, and I liked the characters. Although there are traces of the usual stereotypes, it’s not overbearing and cheesy like so many others before it.
The pace of the film worked well. It’s not a typical space action adventure, so unless you like a slow and steady build up, then you may get a little bored. Again, it’s not unlike 2001 in that respect (although there are few films as painfully slow as that!).
It’s not faultless though. There is an inexplicable horror type twist that is totally out of place. There was a perfectly reasonable option open, but the writer/director chose to go down the crazy route. It ends up in a confusing mass of blurred shots and some rather incomprehensible cuts. The last few minutes are ruined as it is a struggle to understand what is going on. Which is a real shame.
I liked it though, and it’s well worth a look.
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Roland Emmerich
Release Date: 14 March 2008
Tagline: It takes a hero to change the world.
Main Cast:
Steven Strait … D’Leh
Camilla Belle … Evolet
Cliff Curtis … Tic’Tic
Some films leave you speechless. 10,000 BC is one of those. It’s astonishing. Astonishingly bad, that is.
The acting is terrible and the story is atrocious. There are so many clichés in it that I don’t know where to start. And it’s historically and geographically inaccurate in the most appalling of ways. And then there’s the terrible case of deuce ex machina on at least two occasions. Inexplicably, there are also two attempts at humour. Both are terrible.
Ok… I’ll try and calm my mind enough to write down everything that is wrong with this film.
I’ve already mentioned the acting. And I have a casting issue. This may be nitpicking, but why couldn’t they cast an actress for Evolet that actually had blue eyes? The role isn’t exactly demanding. In fact, I’m sure that a plank of wood could have played this part equally as well. Perhaps all the blue eyed girls had more sense than to get involved in this pile of rubbish.
Basically, the plot is this. A tribe of people in Arctic like conditions are starving because of the lack of woolly mammoths to hunt. That’s how remote they are. They have nothing else to hunt (this is an important point for a geographical farce).
There’s a prophecy that says that a hero and a blue eyed girl will deliver them from starvation or whatever, and will save the tribe. And that’s where Evolet comes in. Some tribesmen find a girl in alone in the Arctic condition mountains wandering around. They take her back to their home, and she has blue eyes. The audience is supposed to thing ‘ooh’ in a knowing sort of way at this. There is a boy in the tribe (D’Leh) that fancies her. He points out a star in the sky and says something sappy like ‘you’ll always be in my heart’ blah, blah, blah.
First cliché… Head tribesman leaves the clan for the greater good and gives the ‘white spear’ to Tic’Tic. Everyone thinks that it was an act of cowardice (he asked Tic’Tic to keep the real reason secret). His son is mocked by his peers, especially one boy. We come to the conclusion of this cliché later in the film.
Second cliché… The mammoths return, and whoever shows the most bravery and brings one down will get the white spear. Needless to say, D’Leh succeeds at this though there was more accident than bravery about it. So he gets the white spear, but can’t take the guilt and gives it back to Tic’Tic.
Whilst this is going on, raiders attack the camp and capture most of the tribe (including Evolet), and one boy’s mother is killed. So, off they go on a trip to save the tribe. The boy wants to go with them but is told to stay behind. So he follows them secretly (yawn).
Now we get the the geographical farce and the first deuce ex machina. After they have trekked over the mountains they come to lush forestation. And then they suddenly appear in Africa, and not northern Africa either. Strangely enough, head tribesman of the Africans speaks the same language. Aparrantly, there was a man who came over the mountains and taught them. How fortunate that D’Leh and his cronies run into the same tribe as his father did.
D’Leh manages to amass a bit of a fighting force helped by the…
…Third cliché. D’Leh saves a sabre toothed tiger from certain death. The tiger turns up at a tribe that D’Leh is with, and all is spared because the tiger recognises D’Leh. And what would you know – this tribe has a prophecy that a tamer of a ‘spear tooth’ will deliver them from whatever. By now I couldn’t have cared less.
So, on they trek after the captives. D’Leh gets a bit downhearted as they have lost the trail, but on of these stupid prophecies mentions something about a light or whatever, and D’Leh suddenly remembers his star, and that leads them to Evolet and the other captives (very vomit inducing). Somehow, they have been forced into slavery building the pyramids! Not only is Egypt in north Africa, but the pyramids were not built in 10,000 B.C. And they are shown as being built all together. They weren’t. And I guess this is where they ran out of money, because it isn’t the Pharaoh Kufu (his tomb was the ‘Great Pyramid) in charge, it’s some made up person called the Pyramid God.
Now to deuce ex machina number two and yet another prophecy (I had a prophecy too – that this film would be utter shit). In the slave camp which has ben infiltrated by D’Leh, there is some weird blind man whom they keep in a hole underground. He makes an appearance to look at Evolet’s hand, sees some scars and rambles on about another prophecy. I’m not sure what this one is about, as I had lost the will to live by then.
Needless to say, they slaves revolt, D’Leh gets the white spear, and all turns out just peachy in the end, although we do have a pretence at an unhappy ending, but good old shameness ‘old mother’ from D’Leh’s tribe saves us from bawling our eyes out. I still felt like crying though (with pain).
If you like cliché ridden piles of rubbish then you’ll love 10,000 B.C. If not, then you are better off driving nails into your arms.
Rating: 



(for the woolly mammoths)

Certificate: 
Director: Brad Anderson
Release Date: 18 March 2005
Tagline: How do you wake up from a nightmare when you’re not asleep?
Main Cast:
Christian Bale … Trevor Resnik
Jennifer Jason Leigh … Stevie
Aitana Sánchez-Gijón … Marie
John Sharian … Ivan
I rented this from LoveFilm and by the time it came up on the list for dispatch I’d forgotten what is was about. Having known that I wouldn’t have picked it if It didn’t look good, I decided to just put it in the player and see what happened. What a great decision that was! Don’t read anything about it beforehand – just watch it!
Christian Bale is absolutely fantastic. The fact that he managed to turn himself in to a living skeleton for the role is a thing to behold in itself. The film is intriguing and engaging from the get go, and slowly starts to turn into one of those ‘headf**k’ films that you find yourself totally immersed in. Despite that though, you don’t at any point start thinking “huh?”; instead you feel sure that there *will* be a satisfactory resolution to it. And indeed there is. As you slowly start to understand what’s happening you get a great sense of enjoyment from the cleverly crafted script.
I shall say no more than this – watch it!
Rating: 





Certificate: 
Director: Akira Kurosawa
Release Date: 6 October 1980
Main Cast:
Tatsuya Nakadai … Shingen Takeda / Kagemusha
Tsutomu Yamazaki … Nobukado Takeda
Kenichi Hagiwara … Katsuyori Takeda
Due to reviews, I expected great things of this. Although I enjoyed it, I can’t say that it gripped me. I found it somewhat plodding, and 3 hours of a rather thin plot was stretched to the max. Although I will concede that such time was needed to portray the story effectively.
It looks great, and has a real feel of 16th Century Japan. It’s a very ‘sweeping’ epic, and the central performance by Tatsuya Nakadai is very good. Obviously, I can’t comment on the acting, as I am unqualified to judge non English speaking actors.
If you are a film lover or a fan of this period of Japanese culture, then you’ll get something out of this. However, if you are a ‘blockbuster junkie’, then don’t bother.
This is a very simplistic review, and I’m sure that many people will disagree with me. And, in turn, I would not disagree with them. This is just a personal view, and I am in no way rubbishing Kagemusha
The best thing to do is to watch and judge for yourself.
Rating: 





