A.I.

Certificate: Certificate 12

Director: Steven Spielberg

Release Date: 21 September 2001

Tagline: David is 11 years old. He weighs 60 pounds. He is 4 feet, 6 inches tall. He has brown hair. His love is real. But he is not.

Main Cast:

David … Haley Joel Osment

Monica Swinton … Frances O’Connor

Jude Law … Gigolo Joe

William Hurt … Prof. Hobby

I first saw this on its release, and I was left feeling rather ambivalent. The first half of the film is superb but then it sort of collapses somewhat suddenly into a sort of Blade Runner scenario. And then it gets even odder than that with the introductions of aliens.

One thing I was not left ambivalent about was Haley Joel Osment. He’s absolutely stunning as David and gives one of the best performances in cinematic history.

And then I watched it again and now I have an altogether different opinion of it. I found myself liking the stark contrast. I still think that it could have been less ‘neon futuristic’, but I was expecting it, and it made a difference. I also found myself liking the ending much more. David may not have got what he desperately wanted, but in the end he still finds peace and happiness, and it’s very touching.

Perhaps this film is one of those that ‘improve’ with a second viewing.

Rating: ★★★★½

Spider-Man 3

Certificate: Certificate 12

Director: Sam Raimi

Release Date: 4 May 2007

Tagline: Next summer, the greatest battle lies… Within.

Main Cast:

Tobey Maguire … Peter Parker

Kisrten Dunst … Mary Jane Watson

James Fargo … Harry Osborn

One of my favourite Spider-Man villians is Venom, so I was both excited and concerned at the prospect of his appearance in S-M 3. “Why concerned?” you ask. Well he’s – to put it mildly – vicious. He kills with glee and abandon and nobody is off limits to him, be it man, woman or child.

Venom is a formidable foe in the comic books, and I knew that they would never be able to portray him in his true light. His appearance is all too brief and I was disappointed to see his demise. Ultimately though, it was the best thing to do as he can only ever be a watered down version of his gloriously violent self. It was good to see, however, that they remained true to the comics and the character of Eddie Brock. I was slightly disappointed at the fact that Peter wore a physical black costume. The alien bonds to his host, and Peter’s black suit isn’t a costume at all – the symbiote is the suit (as is later shown when it takes over Eddie Brock).  Again though, I understand why they did it. Peter had to be shown making a conscious decision to allow the symbiote to take control and they didn’t have the time to build up slowly. Films don’t have the luxury of a story arc built over many months. Also, having the exact same costume in black made for great visual images for all the posters ;-)

Sandman is an absolute  triumph of CGI. He’s fantastic, and left me pretty awe-struck. Years ago, I never dreamed that I would be able to see all these heroes and villains come to such fantastic life on the big screen.

Not everybody liked seeing two villains in the same film, and many of the poor reviews claimed that it was too confusing. They obviously missed the fact that neither Sandman or Venom could have been the main foe.

First of all, Sandman was actually a plot device rather than a villain. In fact, he’s not a villain at all. He’s just a man who did desperate things to save his dying daughter. He’s a tragic character, and is there firstly for Peter to react to with feelings of revenge and anger (thus showing us how the alien symbiote is beginning to take over his personality), and then at the end, when Peter has regained himself, he is finally able to lay the ghost of his uncle’s death to rest by understanding and forgiveness.

Secondly, Venom couldn’t have been the main villain because he only appears towards the end of the film. When we see what the alien has done to Eddie, a regular guy with no powers, we understand what the consequences would have been if Peter hadn’t come to his senses and rejected it.

Another gripe was about the depiction of Peter’s personality change. Yes, I would have preferred to see him dealing with criminals with more force than necessary rather than strutting down the street, but they won’t do that with a film that is rated 12. It wouldn’t be good to depict our hero abusing his power by kicking the s***t out of the bad guys. Bowing to pressure and making the films 12 rather than 12A was a decision made based on the marketing value of the franchise. I get annoyed at this, as not everything should be made to suit children. I want films to be made as well as they can be, and not compromised because of keeping parents happy or filling the already bulging pockets of the studios. Anyway, rant over! Back to the review :-)

The reconciliation between Peter and Harry was nicely done, and ended that story arc very well. I’ll miss James Franco in the next one though, as I thought he brought a lot to the role and made Harry very engaging.

So… Did I like it? Hell, yes! Spider-Man 3 is an exciting, thrilling and very satisfying film. It was also used as a way to tie up loose ends so that we can start afresh and not have S-M 4 (there will surely be another) cluttered up with unfinished business.

Rating: ★★★★★

Spider-Man 2

Certificate: Certificate 12

Director: Sam Raimi

Release Date: 16 July 2004

Tagline: Sacrifice.

Main Cast:

Tobey Maguire … Peter Parker

Kirsten Dunst … Mary Jane Watson

James Franco … Harry Osborn

Alfred Molina … Dr Otto Octavius

After the sheer brilliance that was Spider-Man the question on everybody’s lips was “Can they do it again?” The answer was an emphatic “Yes!” We needn’t have worried as S-M 2 is just as thrilling as the first.

This time, the super-criminal is Dr Octopus. A good choice, as he’s one of the best known characters from the Spider-Man universe. Obviously, there is some character development for the main protagonists, but this is done very well. There’s not too much to bore the casual veiwer, and just enough to keep us dedicated fans happy.

Just like its predecessor, S-M 2 is unmissable.

Rating: ★★★★★

Spider-Man

Certificate: Certificate 12A reduced later to

Director: Sam Raimi

Release Date: 14 June 2002

Tagline: With great power comes great responsibility.

Main Cast:

Tobey Maguire … Peter Parker

Willem Dafoe … Norman Osborn

Kirsten Dunst … Mary Jane Watson

James Franco … Harry Osborn

For those of us who grew up reading the DC and Marvel comics (and especially Spider-Man) this is truly the stuff of dreams. It’s amazing how, finally, we are able to see Spidey swinging through the streets of New York in the exact same way you see him in the comics. It’s jaw-droppingly stunning. This is a perfect example of how to use CGI.

Everything about it is fantastic. First of all, though, I have to mention the suit – it’s drop-dead gorgeous! Maguire and Dafoe are perfectly cast. Dafoe even looks like the Norman Osborn from the comics! J. K. Simmons makes a brilliant J. Jonah Jameson! My only gripe about the cast is Kirsten Dunst. There doesn’t seem to be any chemistry between her and Maguire.

The story is also very faithful to the comic book canon. Very little has been changed, and the one or two alterations are done either to bring it more up to date (such as the spider being genetically engineered rather than being zapped by radiation), or by other constraints. Whilst I’m on the subject of the spider, I loved the fact that they made it the colour of the suit.

This is one of those films that you have to see. Even if you’ve never read a comic in your life you’ll love it. No prior knowledge of Spider-Man is required. Just sit back and enjoy the ride!

Now for some trivia. Look out for Stan Lee (the creator of Spidey), Bruce Campbell (Sam Raimi’s longtime friend & colleague) and Ted Raimi (Sam’s brother). All will feature in the sequels too. And for the Xena fans among us – keep an eye out for Lucy Lawless (also a friend of Raimi) – almost unrecognizeable as a punk!

Rating: ★★★★★

Elektra

Certificate: Certificate 12

Director: Rob Bowman

Release Date: 21 January 2005

Tagline: She’s the last thing that stands between good and evil.

Main Cast:

Jennifer Garner … Elektra

Goran Visnjic … Mark Miller

Kirsten Prout … Abby Miller

Ok. Everything about this film is terrible. I can’t think of one redeeming feature. It’s so incredibly boring it defies belief. The plot is rubbish, the ‘action’ is so bad it puts you to sleep and the acting is bordering on atrocious. Jennifer Garner is more wooden than a plank, and Goran Visnjic (the rather dreamy doctor from ER) is so miscast it’s untrue. And then there’s that hideous child – but don’t get me started on that.

I can’t believe that even Elektra fans would find this entertaining. In fact, if I was an Elektra fan I’m sure I’d have boiled over with rage. Unless, that is, that the Elektra comic is awful too. I would have turned this off half way through, but I love films so much that I wanted to stick with it in case it got better. It didn’t. I truly believe that this is the worst film I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot.

If you’re a masochist, then go for it and watch this. Otherwise, leave well alone.

Rating: ☆☆☆☆☆

P.S. No, that is not a mistake – even 0 stars is being too generous.

    
greebly’s Film Reviews is based on WordPress platform, RSS tech , RSS comments design by Gx3.